Tuesday, 18 April 2017

Beyond weight Loss - Inflammation

I thank Dr Stephen Phinney for the key information in this post.

Dr Stephen Phinney

Background on Inflammation

In the past GP's have been trained to think only of acute inflammation: redness, pain and heat; signs of distress in the body, and the effort the body is making to repair cellular damage. So they were taught to treat the symptoms of inflammation; for instance putting ice on a sprain, and football players taking to cold pools after the match. It turns out that both these practices delay healing, which is the purpose of inflammation. Even with something this basic, our understanding of how to treat traumatic injury, or fever has been wrong for a long time.

The presence of low-grade chronic inflammation in the body wasn't recognised in science before 1992. Dr W.D. Kannel of Harvard, reviewing data from the Framingham Heart Study, noted that high cholesterol only identified about 50% of those who had heart attacks. Looking for another risk factor he noted that an elevated white blood cell count, but still within the normal range, was apparently a good marker of heart disease risk. Why that might be so, was not understood.

The Women's Health Initiative, the study terminated in 1998, produced the data that confirmed Kannel's observation. Type two diabetes, is characterised by system-wide inflammation. The population of the study was divided into quartile's on the basis if type two diabetes risk. Then the inflammation data for each group was evaluated. There were two measurements of inflammation, C-Reactive Protein, and Interleukin-6.

Comparing the mean inflammation of the lowest risk quartile with the highest risk quartile, they found this result. C-Reactive Protein was 15.7 times higher, and Interleukin-6 was 7.5 times higher in the high risk quartile.

In 2005 Karen Margolis reported from the WHI data, that "The white blood cell count, is a stable, well-standardized, widely available and inexpensive measure of systemic inflammation, and is an independent predictor of CVD events and all-cause mortality in postmenopausal women."

In 2007 Margolis reported that "Postmenopausal women with higher WBC counts have a higher risk of incident invasive breast, colorectal, endometrial, and lung cancer, as well as a higher risk of breast, lung, and overall cancer mortality."

Measuring Inflammation in the Body

There are many possible measures of low grade inflammation, at least 20.

The must commonly used are the following six
Total white blood cell count
Absolute granulocyte count
C-reactive protein
Serum amyloid A

Dr Phinney says; "The only tool in my list of medications for reducing inflammation, is one of the newer statins. The best solution for this problem is to find ways to reduce or avoid the creation of inflammation in the first place."

Fighting Inflammation with Nutrition

The following foods reduce inflammation: Fruits and vegetables, especially the colourful ones with flavanoids. Omega 3 oils, like fish oil. Moderate use of alcohol. If you want an anti-inflammatory supplement use gamma-topopherol

The following foods are inflammatory. Omega-6 fats are essential, but our diet is flooded with them, and in excess they are highly inflammatory. Iron in excess too, and Dr Phinney thinks Iron is over prescribed, when the real problem is carbohydrate intolerance. Trans-fats, are highly inflammatory, but in NZ there is no requirement to label products containing trans-fats, and no ban on their use (The argument is made that they are rarely used in NZ food products). Sugar, but particularly fructose is inflammatory. Alpha-topopherol is sold as an anti-inflammatory, but in the body it blocks gamma-topopherol, the bodies natural inflammatory defence, defeating our objective.

So Phinney recommends eating fish three times a week, using gamma-topopherol (Sometimes sold as Gamma-E), drinking wine in moderation, eating lots of fat or olive oil, and eating a very low carbohydrate diet.

Evidence Supporting LCHF Diets to Reduce Inflammation

Cassandra Forscythe
Cassandra Forsythe, Women's Fitness
Cassandra Forsythe, in research for her PhD, looked at low-fat v low-carbohydrate diets, and the inflammation they produced. Cassandra was working with Dr Jeff Volek in the Department of Kineseology at the University of Connecticut. Both Stephen Phinney and Richard Feinman were part of her advisory team.

Inflammation is clearly recognised as a prominent feature of many chronic common medical problems. Heavy intake of carbohydrate at any meal, induces an increase in reactive oxygen species, and activates pro-inflammatory pathways.

Comparison of Low Fat and Low Carbohydrate Diets on Circulating Fatty Acid Composition and Markers of Inflammation:
Forty overweight men and women were enrolled. Qualifications; aged 18 to 55; BMI >25; total triglyceride's elevated; and low HDL-C. People using glucose lowering, blood pressure lowering, or lipid lowering medications were excluded. Two groups were formed balanced for gender, age and BMI. One group was assigned a low-fat diet. The other group a very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet.

The study was for 12 weeks. No advice to reduce calories was offered to either group. All participants were given individual counseling and a personalised diet, by a registered dietitian. This was reinforced each week when each participant came to a weigh-in. Further education and advice was offered as required. Detailed 7 day food diaries were maintained for weeks one, six and twelve.

Reducing the amount of carbohydrate in the diet led to "considerably greater reductions in a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines (both signalling protein molecules indicating cell damage) and adhesion molecules.

While weight loss may help reduce inflammation, the greatest reductions of inflammation were achieved by those who best restricted carbohydrate intake regardless of weight loss. The very-low-carbohydrate diet had strong advantage in blood lipid normalisation, blood glucose control and in reducing the demand for insulin.

A striking result of the VLC Ketogenic Diet was an increase in arachidonic acid, which appears to be beneficial. Several pro-inflammatory markers were reduced including; TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, E-selectin, I-CAM, and PAI-1 that were related to the increase in arachidonic acid.

The abstract to the paper, "Comparison of Low Fat and Low Carbohydrate Diets on Circulating Fatty Acid Composition and Markers of Inflammation," is available (PDF). Today, she works as a nutrition educator and weight loss coach and is the author of two popular books for women: “The New Rules of Lifting for Women”, co-authored with Lou Schuler and Alwyn Cosgrove, and “Women's Health Perfect Body Diet”.

John Stephen Veitch
The Network Ambassador
                    Printable Version Printer of this Essay
localOpen Future Health Limited - local You may comment privately to John S Veitch here:
Or please think about this essay, and return to the blog to write a comment.

Saturday, 8 April 2017

Fighting Inflammation in the Body

The authors of "The Modern Nutritional Diseases," Alice and Fred Ottoboni write; "The broad underlying cause of all noninfectious diseases that are now epidemic (in modern communities) is chronic inflammation. All of these diseases have the same underlying cause; long term, low-level inflammation, brought about primarily by unhelpful diet."

Hives over my back. Itchy skin.
This problem lasted a year, 2014-2015. I'm sure it was caused by my "healthy diet," in this case eating far too much fruit. It took me a long time to "discover" that.
Three years ago I got quite sick, with a rash all over my body. I couldn't sleep in a warm bed. I couldn't resist scratching, until the skin started to bleed. The rash that the doctor called hives, occurred all over the body. It was worse at night, one factor that made me think it was related to my diet.

Sometimes it was so bad I didn't want to leave the house. In public resisting scratching was a burden.

My doctor said it was caused by an over-reactive immune system. That I'd never find out what caused it. One day it would go away as strangely as it came about. In one sense he was right about that, although it was about a year, before that happened. This was the first time I became aware of what generalised inflammation could be like.

Elimination to "discover" a Healthy Diet

I was convinced that my diet was causing the problem. There's a list of foods people are often allergic to, and I tried to eliminate those foods from my diet. With no effect. Many months later, when I tried gluten free (an idea I rejected for a long time), there was some improvement. By now my diet was quite restricted, and I tripped over the Banting Diet idea. Low-carbohydrate. I was almost there. "Cut out all grains and potatoes and eat less fruit." I could do that.

The result was a surprise. The rash went away and I began to lose weight quite quickly. I now think that the fruit I was eating, fruit I thought was "healthy," was the main dietary cause of my rash.

But I struggled with the new diet. Low-carbohydrate, is half of the story. For energy, on a low-carbohydrate diet you MUST eat a lot of fat. It took some months for me to learn that lesson. I experimented with coconut oil and olive oil. I ate quite of lot of coconut flesh. But in the end the best answer is the natural fat on the meat and lots of delicious butter.

Weight Loss Without Effort

Dr Jeff Volek has done a feeding experiment lasting five months where people only ate the meals supplied from the research kitchen. The group began in a very low carbohydrate diet (50g a day). There was a three week lead in period, so the subjects were already in ketosis to begin with.

Every three weeks the diet changed, but the calories in the diet were held constant. In six stages the carbohydrate in the diet was increased. The six steps were: 50g, 83g, 130g, 180g, 250g and 346g of carbohydrate per day.

Briefly, on less than 130g of carbohydrate a day, most people lose weight. From 130g to 250g of carbohydrate a day weight trends to be stable. Above 250g of carbohydrate a day weight tends to increase. So to lose weight you need to eat less than 130g a carbohydrate a day. But, if you get that amount down to 50g a day you'll be in ketosis and the weight loss will be more rapid and you'll fuel your body with ketones, rather than glucose.

Depending on your metabolism, somewhere between 130g and 50g of carbohydrate a day, there is a switch of metabolism from glucose burning to ketone burning. This switch takes a little time to settle in, seven to twenty days, perhaps longer if your diet is erratic. In the same way once ketosis is established, you tend to stay there unless you break the restriction several times.

There are two ways to do a very low carbohydrate diet. Choose not to be in ketosis. Eat about 130gm of carbohydrate a day, and have more carbohydrate options in your diet. Or, bite the bullet and keep you carbohydrates very low, aiming for 50gm a day. Being in ketosis will reduce the inflammation in your body, and you'll feel better for that.

Disseminated Vascular Inflammation

Dr Tim Noakes argues that type two diabetes is "disseminated vascular inflammation" caused by an excess of insulin in the blood vessels over a long period of time. When the arteries are inflamed in this way the smallest blood vessels are destroyed, and larger blood vessels develop problems in their walls. This might be the beginning point for a build up of materials in the cell wall that partially obstruct the flow of blood.

Like most things that happen in the body, normally inflammation is tightly controlled. For instance when glucose is oxidized in the mitochondria, free radicals, or more correctly reactive oxygen species are produced. Simultaneously the anti-oxidants to control that release are also made.

However if your system isn't functioning well ROS are not controlled and damage to your tissues will occur. This sort of damage is typical of the aging process in the body.

Varicose Veins Improving

The following result is quite unexpected.

I've had varicose veins all my life. My mother had them badly. I've had six previous operations and some other treatments over the last 40 years. Today those operations are not available under the public health service. Back in 2013, because of the ulcer, my doctor and I were discussing future surgical options. I needed to start building a fund to pay for that surgery.

I had always believed that varicose veins were caused by faulty valves, and that it was a simple, incurable mechanical problem. Hence the surgical solution was obvious, even if it only worked for 10-15 years.

Early in 2016, I changed to the Banting diet. Two key things happened. I lost almost 20kg, and because I'm in ketosis most of the energy my body uses comes from ketones. There is very little surplus glucose in my body, and insulin levels are always low.

I think that as a result of my diet, the amount of inflammation in my blood vessels has gone down, apparently to zero. The photographs tell the story. Somehow those faulty valves seem to rediscovered their power. Not perfectly, because I still have varicose veins, but today there is no sign of that ulcer, although you can see where it once was.

Which leg would you prefer to have? The 2013 version or the 2017 version?

Leg swollen, painful to touch, itchy at night. Ulcer. Considering surgery.
My left ankle 2013. (About 50% full size.)
My ankle was sensitive to pressure, and often itchy during the night. You can see that the leg is full of fluid, swollen, and the veins are under pressure. Half way up the image, above the ankle bone, there is a wound from an ulcer not fully healed yet (now 6mm across), after three months of healing. It had been six times that size. Notice the blueness of the veins under the ankle bone.
Swelling gone. No pain or itchiness. No sign of the ulcer returning.
My left ankle 2017. (About 50% full size.)
My ankle isn't very pretty, but it's in much better health. Notice first that the swelling has gone, and while there is still some pressure in the veins it's not nearly as great. The ropes of expanded blue veins, that used to cross my feet have gone. The ankle is no longer sensitive to pressure and the itchiness has gone.

What is Inflammation

Sometimes inflammation is obvious – it causes redness, warmth, and/or pain. Inflammation in the body is a normal and healthy response to injury or attack by germs. We can see it, feel it and measure it as local heat, redness, swelling, and pain. This is the body's way of getting more nourishment and more immune activity into an area that needs to fend off infection or heal.

However, chronic inflammation can be invisible and silent. Chronic inflammation has been linked to cardiovascular diseases. ... Because the cytokines that respond to these insults are in the bloodstream, they can lead to systemic inflammation. Inflamed blood vessels and growing fatty plaque can cause blockages and blood clots, which can cause heart attacks.

Inflammatory skin diseases are the most common problem in dermatology. They come in many forms, from occasional rashes accompanied by skin itching and redness, to chronic conditions such as dermatitis (eczema), rosacea, hives, seborrheic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Skin inflammation can be characterized as acute or chronic.

Eating foods to which you are allergic causes inflammation which makes your adrenal glands secrete hormones which destabilize your insulin and blood sugar levels. ... Thus, food allergies can lead to weight gain, and a high amount of body fat can promote inflammation and exacerbate problems with allergies.

Three years ago, when my body was highly inflamed, but I didn't understand that language. My hives reaction was chronic (long lasting), and sometimes acute. That condition is technically called chronic idiopathic urticaria. My doctor offered me a cream to reduce the itching and antihistamine tablets.

Inflammation Laboratory Test

Recently at my request, my doctor ordered a C-reactive protein (CRP) test for inflammation. The result was negative. My doctor said that there was medical interest in inflammation, but the test wasn't done very much because nobody knows what to do if the test is positive.

I think I have the solution. Eat a diet that allows you to be in ketosis. When you body burns ketones, it produces very few inflammatory ROS, and your vascular system will become less inflamed.

Usually inflammation is fairly obvious anyway but there are three laboratory tests for it. C-reactive protein (CRP) is one common test for inflammation. The level of CRP increases when you have certain diseases which cause inflammation. CRP can be measured from a blood sample.

John Stephen Veitch                     Printable Version Printer of this Essay
The Network Ambassador
localOpen Future Health Limited - local You may comment privately to John S Veitch here:    Or write publicly in the comment box below.

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

Following the Weston Price Dietary Recommendation

At the Living Economies Expo, in Lyttelton over the weekend, I met a number of obese people who I tried to engage in conversation about weight loss. Largely I failed to be helpful or effective. If you imagine there's nothing to learn here reading this general introduction to nutrition will get you interested.

The Bus Drivers

First of all there were the bus drivers. At least four, perhaps more. All the bus drivers on the long trip to Lyttelton, except one, were obese, two grossly obese. One driver told me that type 2 diabetes was normal for bus drivers, and that all his associates had it. "Nothing can be done unless I lose weight, and I've tried. You don't get much exercise doing this job."

Second, eating less is not a sensible way to lose weight. You simply get hungry, and while for a few days, of a few weeks you might put up with that, eventually you'll give up. The popular idea that you need to make a balance between calories in and calories out, by either controlling what you eat, or by exercising more, is nonsense. The fact that many scientific researchers and doctors still believe that, doesn't make it valid. Your body is not a machine. Definitive proof of that, is in the Women's Health Initiative. (See below) Eight years of eating 350 calories a day less than required for maintenance, created in almost no weight loss at all.

To effectively loose weight forever, you need to eat in a way that ensures that you NEVER feel hungry. If you eat a Banting diet, that will happen, and the weight will fall away. (An alternative is intermittent but regular fasting.)

A Paleo Diet Convert

One woman and her husband were both obese. She was very open an approachable. I asked her if weight loss was one of her objectives. Yes she said, "But I'm on top of that, I've already lost over 30kg." That took me back a bit.

So, I'm interested, and I asked what's the secret? A Paleo diet, low carbohydrate and high fat. Yes, she's got it. Paleo is a question mark, it depends who your expert source is. LCHF is right, but once again some people have better knowledge than others.

Here's the problem. She knows the right words. She has had some success, a great deal of success, with the knowledge she has. Because she "KNOWS" it's difficult for me to help and for her to imagine that she might need help. I'll be interested to find out what the next year brings. She can easily lose another 20kg, and I hope she does.

A Weston Price Follower

I met several Maori and Pacific people who were obese, but were also very well aware that Weston Price was full of praise for Pacific Island and Maori people, for the quality of their diet.

Here is a short video where Weston Price tells you how to prevent tooth decay and poor health. (You have to download the video, and then play it.)

One woman in particular explained that she eats the diet her grandparents ate, exactly the diet that Weston Price recommended. "My diet is excellent," she says. I can tell by looking at her, that her diet is far from excellent. But if that's what she says, there's no room for me to offer her any help.

People quickly put up walls against dietary advice. Each person has his or her own life experience. Everyone knows what a healthy diet is. Except that if 75% of us have weight problems, so perhaps we don't really know at all. We all know what we've been told is a healthy diet for the last 50 years. That's the diet that failed in the very carefully designed and recorded Women's Health Initiative.

This study is very important. It proves that a low-fat diet is not heart protective, and benefits for stroke, breast cancer and colon cancer were not found. Worse, it makes some cancers more likely. The diets of 19,000 women were carefully monitored. They did as they were told, right to the end, when the study was suddenly terminated (because of these bad results). They were told to eat less fat, and increase the consumption of fruits, vegetables and whole grains. They were told to reduce the cholesterol in their diets. They ate just a little less each day than they might have wanted. The diet was planned to be 350 calories a day short, so gradual weight loss of about 14 kg a year would occur. That didn't happen. The body simply down-regulated to make up for the short-fall, and the weight remained the same.

A Busy Young Professional

This woman was a volunteer at the Expo, someone who worked very hard. She was complaining about her lack of fitness. I asked if she would like to lose some weight? Immediately the defensive walls went up. I'm OK, I have a personal trainer. I've lost 6kg in the last year. I'm happy.

I've heard that story before. The personal trainer might be very good, at improving strength and aerobic performance, and flexibility. But none of that resolves the poor diet problem. Poor diet is CAUSED by poor knowledge, often the knowledge the person involved thinks is the key to "good health."

If you already know the how to eat in a healthy way, so that you can control your weight, anything I might happen to know is not of importance to you.

The Wrong Knowledge Problem

If you want to understand why everything you were told about diet for most of your life, has been completely ass about face, you can read about that here, in four pages, or buy Nina Teicholz's book "The Big Fat Surprise" in over 400 pages.

I've already written about two wrong ideas commonly held, even by professionals. That you need to exercise to reduce weight. And to lose weight you need to eat less so that calories consumed balance the calories you burn during the day. Both those ideas are wrong as explained in the section about bus drivers, and the WHI above.

There are real choices if you want a weight loss diet. Banting or Low-Carbohydrate High-Fat is the most efficient and painless way, but there are other alternatives. Perhaps the most useful of those is the simple act of fasting. An extended overnight fast, is a very effective tool, when combined with low carbohydrate principles.

The woman eating a Paleo diet needs to know that if carbohydrates are kept below 120gm a day weight loss is likely, even though one is not in ketosis. For more rapid weight loss, it's desirable to be in ketosis and for that the amount of carbohydrate in the diet needs to be less than 50gm a day. She would benefit from reading some of the research studies Dr Jeff Volek has done.

I suspect that the Weston Price advocate is confused about what Weston Price actually said. I doubt if she understands what carbohydrates are, and why that is important. It's common to meet people, who are quite well educated, but still confused about which foods are or are not sources of carbohydrates.

She might also benefit from knowing that when she eats breakfast, if she eats zero carbohydrates, fat burning will continue. Perhaps continue all day if she's careful about the foods she chooses for lunch.

Finally the young professional woman. She's already eating a gluten free diet, with some success. She will probably find that a grain free diet is even better. She was worried about high blood pressure. If she adopts a Banting diet her blood pressure will probably return to normal.

The other issue people raise when I speak of a high fat diet, is their fear of high cholesterol. The Framingham Study showed conclusively that total cholesterol was ineffective as an indicator of future heart disease.

Because the ability to test for HDL-C and LDL-C had been developed, and they had drugs (statins) that reduce LDL-C, the recommended protocol switched to using statins to lower LDL-C. It turns out that LDL-C carries a payload of particles, and the nature of those particles is important. If the particles are large and fluffy they are harmless. If they are small and dense, they might be harmful.

People eating a low fat diet, produce small dense particles, and low HDL-C. People eating a high fat diet, produce large fluffy particles, and high HDL-C. That's a double advantage because high HDL-C is known to be protective against CVD and Alzheimer's.

John Stephen Veitch                     Printable Version Printer of this Essay
The Network Ambassador
localOpen Future Health Limited - local You may comment privately to John S Veitch here:    Or write publicly in the comment box below.

Failure of Governance, Environmental Collapse and Vegetarian Diets

Between the last post on 13th March and now my plan was to post four times before the end of March. So here we are at the 4th of April, rather late, with the first of those posts.

To begin with, I got involved with the Living Economies Expo, at Lyttelton over the weekend, 31 March, 1st and 2nd of April. There was a week of preparation before hand. It's been a busy time, but I've had lots of energy, and working hard is good for you. In addition I learned a lot. Previously I've done quite a lot of work in this area, in my Open Future New Zealand site. There are ten content areas in the site, and here is the opening page to four of them: Right Prices in the Market
Having an Appropriate Dream
Justice and Poverty
Building Resilient communities.

Although that site was last seriously worked on five years ago, most of what it says is still relevant. I'm pleased to report that across the world the sort of thinking I was doing back then is now bearing fruit. Your feedback is always appreciated.

Failure of Governance and Political Corruption

When governance fails, when politics is used for personal enrichment, where economic opportunity is destroyed by lack of investment in education, infrastructure and fair rules of trade, most people live in enforced poverty.

We can see that pattern in Eastern Europe in particular, where poor governance and lack of economic opportunity has caused both a severe decline in the birth rate, and a strong desire among the young to emigrate to a country that offers better education, employment and lifestyle choices. Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal also have this problem.

Population Decline is Already Happening

In Syria, drought was followed by a failure to support bankrupt farmers, those farmers migrated to the city, leading to discontent, protests, and finally to civil war. Syria has suffered the greatest population decline of all nation states in 2013-2016. Expect more of that, in many other countries.

Poor governance has also caused the populations of South Africa and Puerto Rico to decline. Another way to see where there are problems in the world, is to look at the statistics for orphans in various counties. In Asia, for instance in India, China and Bangladesh. In Africa, Nigeria, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, have extreme problems with children who have no parents.

Ecological Collapse

Humanity has problems, caused by excessive population, excessive production of waste, and excessive consumption of many of the earth's natural resources. Humanity demands more not less. We are already consuming the earth at a faster rate than natural replenishment can occur. The logical result of that is ecological collapse, as seen today in Syria, Dafur, Somalia, Honduras, Haiti and many other places. Often just reported as a drought, or a flood, as civil protest or as war; but over several years, repeated "events" mean the land is no longer a place for sustainable agricultural production, or for a stable community, at least for the existing population. That flows on to create economic and social hardship, leading to political protests and community disruption.

Fifteen years ago in Canterbury, NZ, there was a movement to hold an annual celebration of the quality of Canterbury water, the ground-water and our rivers. Today those rivers are rated amongst the worst in the country, sometimes they dry-up altogether. The groundwater is over allocated and declining, often polluted by nitrogen (or even micro-organisms) filtering down from the over-stocked and soil depleted farmland above. Degraded rivers and estuaries reduce spawning opportunities for many fish types, and birds are deprived of habitat.

Seven years ago scientists identified Nine Planetary Boundaries. Here is Johan Rockstrom's Ted talk on that topic.

In the last seven years we've seen the situation get noticeably worse.

World-wide the oceans are becoming more acidic, threatening coral reefs everywhere, removing a key spawning ground for fish species. Add to that the continuing irresponsibility in the way we choose to fish the oceans. Major fishing grounds have already disappeared, the North Sea, the Grand Banks and the East China Sea, as examples. Over fishing upsets the ecological balance of the ocean, hence the loss of most large ocean fish, the explosion of jelly-fish populations because of the loss of predators, and as fish stocks decline the loss of both food supply and employment in the fishing industry.

The world is facing environmental degradation on many fronts. The economy is dependent on climate, on water supply, on energy supply and on political stability. Failure triggered by the stressed environment will happen, we are far too far, down the cause and effect chain, to prevent environmental catastrophes. We are causing climate change with a 40+ year lag in effect. Quite likely the world is already committed to 4 degrees of warming. That will prohibit agriculture as we know it, in the lifetime of people who are alive today. Ocean acidification, and the loss of biodiversity on the planet, signals ecological destruction, and our own demise. The failure of humanity to be good stewards of the planet, will lead to catastrophic population decline at some stage. We have seen the beginning of this trend. The dominoes will continue to fall, at a gathering pace.

Can Vegetarian or Vegan dietary change be a solution?

The Living Economies Expo was attended by good people trying to do their best for the environment, for the community and for their own health. They are well educated and informed. They are concerned about the overuse of natural resources, the collapse of local economies, and the viability of local food production. They seek to develop the social connectedness of communities, using local currencies and local decision making processes.

Regarding food and nutrition, there were a large number of vegetarians, and some vegan's in attendance. I've very little to offer people who think that way. As individuals, they have the very best of intentions for the planet, for society, and for their own health. I used to believe that their standards were a "gold standard" we should all try to achieve. Only 5-6 years ago my own meat consumption was down to chicken and fish, each about once a week. I thought that was healthy eating, but I was getting fat, and my diet was the problem.

Today my message isn't one of comfort to vegetarians. The planet doesn't care, it will get on just fine, in fact even better, if all humans are gone.

Some might argue that if everyone was vegan, we could take the cattle off the land, and things would improve. In nature, mixed farming with both grazing and foraging animals and with forestry and cropping is desirable to restore the soils. Think organic farming, rather than rotational cropping. Better still, think of permaculture forests as the ideal way to improve both soils and food sources for human health. But with a much smaller world population. What's best for both the land and for human health, is unlikely to support the profit objectives of multi-national food production companies. The financial imperative driving the world towards ecological collapse remains.

Grain production is stable or rising slowly, but at about half the rate of population increase. There is potential to improve the productivity rates, but on the ground that's proving hard to put into practice. Besides populations that are heavily reliant on grains for nutrition don't enjoy the best health.

If everyone in the world was vegetarian, the outcome for the world would be the same. We will be unable to feed everyone. Ecological collapse will still happen. Being vegetarian is a personal sacrifice you make, for no long run benefit for the planet or for society as a whole.

Finally, being vegetarian is bad for your own health. It's possible for people to be both healthy and vegetarian. But it's difficult to do. Many people fully committed to this lifestyle for 20 our more years, even people who spent years teaching people how to be successful vegetarians, finally get sick themselves. After a long battle to get well again, they finally begin to eat meat again. When they do, good health returns. Both Zoe Harcombe and Nina Teicholz had that experience, and it's a commonly reported situation.

In talking to people face to face, I've met many obese vegetarians. I know precisely why they are obese. They need much more fat in their diet. Olive oil and coconut oil will do the job, but honestly, animal fats and animal organs are a much easier way to get the fats and the minerals and vitamins you need.

John Stephen Veitch                     Printable Version Printer of this Essay
The Network Ambassador
localOpen Future Health Limited - local You may comment privately to John S Veitch here:    Or write publicly in the comment box below.

John Stephen Veitch
The Network Ambassador
Open Future Limited - You may comment privately to John S Veitch here: